As we have seen in an
earlier blog quoting from Rhode Scholar and former dean of law at the
University of Western Ontario in his book LAWYERS GONE BAD – Money, Sex and
Madness in Canada’s Legal Profession at p. 234, the learned scholar ask a
simple question, how much justice can the average Canadian afford and his brief
answer was none.
In the blog LAW SOCIETIES SHOULD NOT BE POLICING LAWYERS http://accesstojustice70.blogspot.ca/2015/11/law-societies-should-not-be-policing.html I gave some background as to why law societies in Canada cannot police lawyers and that the Province of Ontario has failed Ontarians in enacting Bill 14, Access to Justice, 2006 by not following the recommendations of Sir David Clementi 2004 Report. We have seen in that blog that the British Parliament adopted the recommendations by enacting Legal Services Act, 2007.
Over the course of the
next few months, I will come back to this question because it is imperative in
Canada to take the control of policing lawyers from the law societies just as
it was important to take the control of Police policing themselves.
It is important to
quote extensively from what Mr. Slayton had to say about law societies:
“Law societies are run
by lawyers, according to the world view and temperament of lawyers.” This is
important because of how the New World Order has evolved since President Reagan
and Prime Minister Mulroney signed the first free trade agreement and how that
agreement was forced on Canadian. This
will be the subject of another blog.
The paragraph
continues:
“It is no surprise that
they have the same agenda and attitude as their members. Law Societies are by nature conservative and
protective of the status quo[GB1] . They nourish their own and are the voice of the establishment. A law society member who is different risks
severe criticism and marginalization.”
As a footnote to the
last sentence he stated: “One might
think that this is what happened to Harry Kopyto.” He devoted a chapter to my
good friend Harry. I will also need a
few blog to deal with the Kopyto saga with the Law Society of Upper
Canada. He has been practicing as a paralegal
since 1989 offering his expertise to people who could neither afford lawyers or
justice. The Law Society is refusing to
licence him and he is challenging the refusal.
What follows in the
paragraph is very important:
“It is not the law
societies of Canada that will change things. Amongst lawyers themselves there is a growing resistance to the
expanding concept of ‘professional misconduct’ …”
As the Police in
Ontario could not police themselves, neither can the Law Society of Upper
Canada police lawyers. I have been
involved with a number of complaints and from my experience in dealing with the
Law Society of Upper Canada the faster that we will be able to bring the
Ontario government to its sense the better chance that the average Ontarian
will have a chance to access justice.
These quote are taken from page 238
The other problem that
the average Canadian faces is what lawyers are taught at law school. Which is “Access to Justice is not on the
agenda”. Therefore, the paragraph
contain an important message that ought to be quoted at length:
“Law school encourages
cosmopolitan desires and pursuits. It
reaffirms traditional values. It teaches
what the economist Paul Seabright has called ‘the narrative’. Students are encouraged to anticipate wealth
and power; they are told how to serve the rich, for it is only the rich who can
afford lawyers; they are taught rules, techniques, and toughness, and learn to
avoid emotional involvement or moral judgment.
This is what law students, and those who will eventually employ them
want. Access to justice is not on the
agenda.”
Again in further blog,
I will demonstrate how lawyers especially those working for the Attorney
Generals in Canada will seeks ways to obstruct justice.
[GB1]Reagan
was a Republican a party known for its conservative leaning and Prime Minister
Mulroney, a lawyer was leader of therogressive Conservative Party of Canada
No comments:
Post a Comment